August 20, 2019

Phipps Vs. Toronto Police Services Board

Visit the Ontario Human Rights Commission website at Under “Our Work”>Legal” choose the case related to police action (i.e. Phipps Vs. Toronto Police Services Board). Critically analyze the case by considering the actions of the officers involved. How were their actions or behaviours discriminatory?> What effect did their actions have on the offended party and the community? What could the officers have done to avoid discrimination of this sort?
August 20, 2019

Case Brief

Case brief of case 29-4 (Attached). Case brief should include a summary of the Facts, Issues, Decision and Rationale or Reason for the major issues in the case. A sample brief of Case 1-1 is attached. Don’t use any source and follow the attached example case brief. One page.
August 20, 2019


You will be arguing factually why you believe carding is an issue, what examples exist to support that this is a practice that is problematic OR is NOT problematic. If you feel that it is, derive your facts from real cases and statistics or research done online.
August 20, 2019

Police and PTSD

you are to locate at least three separate online articles on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and police-related stress. You will: Discuss the relevance of PTSD and police-related stress to police officers Discuss at least two challenges related to police officers dealing with these stresses Explain symptoms, causes, and treatments
August 20, 2019

Discussion board

Topic 1: Your company has recently hired a new person. Shortly after this individual begins work, the company receives a “garnishment order.” This court order specifies that a certain percentage of the employee’s salary must be deducted each paycheck in order to satisfy a money judgment that has been entered against the employee. After complying with the court order order for several paychecks, the company receives another court order to stop paying the garnishment (it turns out the employee was not notified of the proceedings that lead to a money judgment against him). A few months later, in the same […]
August 20, 2019


Now that you have a topic for your final paper, it is time to do some research. You need to find academic sources that will help you answer your question. For this part, you will essentially turn in an annotated bibliography. You must find 5 outside academic sources. Your sources must fit the following criteria: 1. They must be academic books, peer-reviewed journals, or law review articles. 2. They must be sources that were not used as class readings. a. But feel free to use these sources in your paper! 3. If sources are more than a decade or so […]
August 20, 2019

Employment Law Discussion Board

Section 1 A male employee complains to his supervisor. The employee is gay. He says another employee – who is straight – says things whenever the gay employee passes the straight employee’s cubicle. The gay employee says the straight employee makes sexually suggestive remarks to him, like “Nice buns” or “Nice basket.” of “I’d let you ‘do’ me, even if I am straight.” The straight employee shows pictures of handsome men from his sports magazine to the gay employee and says, “I bet you wouldn’t throw him out of bed for eating crackers!” or “I bet you’d like to see […]
August 20, 2019

US Law

Please prepare two items 1. Interrogatives (4pages ) and research production (3 pages) You may choose ur side to pick either sally soprano or lyric Opera. For this answer you should think critically about the issues in the mock complaint, and your answer defenses and counterclaim you submitted. Think about what additional evidence you may assist you as you continue to litigate the case, and in the event you go to trial. I am going to attach the 2 templates which may help you these are example of the format needed.
August 20, 2019

Canadian Criminal Law

You have to write a paper with two separate parts, one for each of the fact scenarios which follow. You are told what criminal act(s) a person committed, and you are told how things turned out at the end. Your assignment is to state and briefly explain the procedural steps that it took to get from the beginning to the end (i.e. you will be asked to fill in the blanks of what must have happened from beginning to end). Each section should deal with most of the following topics. Between the two sections, your paper should address each of […]
August 20, 2019

Canadian Employment Law

Please read the fact scenario attached to complete the assignment instructions. 1. You are working as a clerk at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) and are tasked to assess this complaint on the basis of whether there is a prima facie case, absent any response from the employer, in favour of the two complainants. (1,500 words max in a legal memo format) Include the following: • heading • succinct identification of the legal issue(s) • short summary of your conclusion • review of relevant facts • discussion of the law relevant to the legal issues, and application of […]
Prev page
Next page